By Prof. Dr Lieven Annemans, expert trainer of the courses
Health Economics for Non-Health-Economists, Basics of Health Economics, and Critical New HTA Developments in Europe: Challenges & Solutions
Often, when preparing a case for an HTA, only economic factors are taken into account. However, HTA bodies also highly value the best scientific evidence on the medical, social, and ethical implications of investments in health care.
The EU’s co-funded joint actions on HTA (EUnetHTA Joint Actions) have identified nine domains by reference to which health technologies are assessed. Of these nine domains, four are clinical and five are non-clinical.
The identification of a health problem and current health technology, in other words, what is the condition that is treated or prevented, and what are the current treatment and prevention options and their effectiveness
The examination of the technical characteristics of the health technology under assessment, for instance, the mode of administration, the duration of dose of the treatment, …
Its relative safety
Its relative clinical effectiveness
The latter 2 are key criteria in order to assess whether the new technology (such as a medicine or a medtech solution) is offering added therapeutical value for patients or for other stakeholders
Cost and Economic Evaluation of a health technology, whereby the focus is on cost-effectiveness, and its
Ethical (for instance, who can benefit from this technology),
Organisational (for instance, do hospitals have to take measures to make the use of the technology possible),
Social (for instance, impact on certain population groups) and
Legal aspects (for instance, privacy or liability issues)
The joint clinical assessment (JCA) will focus on the clinical domains only.
The nine domains set out what an assessment covers. A second list matters just as much: the criteria that influence the decision itself. Depending on the country, an HTA can address up to ten of them. Some are obvious, others are not always considered, or are left out for practical reasons.
| Criterion | Tip |
|---|---|
| Epidemiology | High prevalence of the disease raises challenges regarding budget impact |
| Medical need | Express the health and economic burden of disease accurately, and benchmark with other conditions |
| Current management | Involve patients to better understand the way they experience the current treatments |
| Efficacy | HTA bodies are not convinced by efficacy data alone |
| Effectiveness | Provide evidence based on designs with high external validity, closer to the real world |
| Patient reported outcomes | Go beyond the QALY to express the true benefits to patients |
| Safety and toxicity | Focus on a good benefit-risk ratio |
| Cost-effectiveness | Explore the willingness to pay threshold, and benchmark with the cost-effectiveness of recently adopted treatments for similar diseases |
| Budget impact | The lower the better. Consider a stratified approach by subgroup, and benchmark with adopted treatments |
| Organisational aspects | Do not ignore this. For example, the impact of a medicine or technology on the work, organisation and financing of health providers |
Successfully planning for HTAs in Europe is an ever more complex undertaking, considering the detailed analyses required for each of the above 9 domains and especially the varying approaches adopted by different countries.
To navigate these complexities, everyone involved in the process must develop a thorough understanding of the expected changes and issues related to both the clinical and the non-clinical domains.
Continue your learning from Lieven
If you’d like to learn more from Lieven, CELforPharma also offers a 1-day, hands-on course where you'll learn:
Don’t miss the latest insights from our expert faculty
Subscribe to our newsletter to: