By Dr Nick Proctor and Megan O'Brien, expert trainers of the Understanding Pharma Market Access & Payers in Europe course
The European healthcare landscape is fragmented and complex. This free slide snapshot gives you a practical framework for categorising payers based on shared characteristics, so you can plan smarter access strategies.
Payer archetypes help you bring structure to a complex payer landscape by grouping payers with similar characteristics.
They are practical planning tools, not precise descriptions of every market or payer.
Archetyping is a generalisation and will always miss market or payer-specific details. Payer decision-making is mostly sequential or hierarchical, so not all payers have the same impact on reimbursement, price, access or funding.
Want to take this guide with you?
Download the full slide snapshot below 👇
The slide snapshot explains three ways to archetype payers, each designed for a specific planning purpose.
Who has the final say?
National markets
Healthcare costs are controlled through national pricing and reimbursement submissions, negotiations and decisions. No other major availability hurdle. National payers exert limited economic influence on individual clinical behaviour.
Multi-tiered markets
National pricing and reimbursement decisions exist, but regions are responsible for managing the healthcare budget. Regions may seek to influence clinical behaviour by limiting formulary inclusion and hence availability.
Decentralised markets
National bodies exercise limited power in restricting availability. Regional and local bodies use financial incentives to influence clinical behaviour.
đź’ˇ Useful for: global launch expenditure planning, planning field force headcount, marketing collateral planning, uptake forecast planning, designing a research sample.
Decision-making is sequential, so not all payers carry equal weight.
National
Sets overall rules or recommendations for reimbursed access. Requires data proving a product is comparatively or cost-effective. Can handle very sophisticated data and models. Interaction is typically via formal submission package with strict guidelines. Often a two-part value and price assessment process.
Regional
In several countries with decentralisation, regional payers are more important. Can provide treatment guidelines or go as far as developing regional formularies where healthcare spending is devolved. Some handle sophisticated data in formal submissions; some group together to review new drugs; some allow informal dialogue and negotiation.
Local / hospital
Formulary committee members alongside their functions as clinicians, pharmacists and administrators. They tend to be less used to sophisticated data; interaction is likely to be less formal.
Patient
In the major five EU markets the patient is not a key payer. However, in a broader context they can be responsible for significant cost-share or full out-of-pocket payment of drug costs.
đź’ˇ Useful for: account management of maturing brands, regional and country-level marketing, planning field force onboarding and training, tailoring research materials, uptake forecast planning.
How a payer makes pricing, reimbursement, funding and access decisions determines what evidence you need to gather during clinical development and evidence generation.
đź’ˇ Useful for: global launch evidence planning, global submission planning, global pricing planning, tailoring research materials.
This slide snapshot was created by Dr Nick Proctor and Megan O’Brien, faculty members and expert trainers for the Understanding Pharma Market Access & Payers in Europe course at CELforPharma, in collaboration with Access Infinity. It is a free excerpt from that course, designed for market access, medical affairs, marketing and business development professionals working across European markets.

Continue your learning from Nick and Megan
If you’d like to learn more from Nick and Megan, CELforPharma also offers a 1-day, hands-on course where you'll:
Don’t miss the latest insights from our expert faculty
Subscribe to our newsletter to: